Spirit Whisperings #14 an occasional personal reflection by Matt Rousso November 2025
Pope Leo and U.S. Bishops Speak Out!
So how do we respond to this clear difference of opinion? Do we say that “we agree to disagree?” Or that “the Pope and Bishops should stick to religion and stay out of politics?” Pope Leo began his papacy stating that he wanted to foster unity and that it’s time for dialogue and not division and dissention. Yet we have grave moral differences of opinion. It is clear from a number of recent statements by Pope Leo that he thinks very differently from many things being said by government officials in the United States and around the world. When he calls for unity and dialogue he is not suggesting that we are going to all think alike. Or that all thinking is correct thinking. He knows there are significant differences of opinions – and he is not in agreement with everyone. So how do we stand in the face of such differences?
The issue re: immigration is not the only instance of the Pope and the Catholic Church speaking out against current social issues and policies! In 2018 Pope Francis changed the Catechism of the Catholic Church to state that the death penalty is “inadmissible” in all cases. Yet, Louisiana’s governor recently ended the 15 year pause on executions. In March of 2025 a man was executed in Louisiana using nitrogen hypoxia. This is another clear difference of opinion … and there are many more.
I think we have to admit we live in a time that demands Critical Thinking on the part of each one of us, something that Pope Leo encourages us to do. In his words, he says we must “think the faith.” Thinking the faith for some may seem irreligious, yet we must not just believe by rote but must think the faith. And this demands critical thinking. For many of us, the Gospel as proclaimed by Jesus is an indispensable source of correct thinking. When we are trying to come to a correct way of thinking, we would do well to ask ourselves if the position that we want to espouse is “antithetical to the Gospel of Jesus?” A way of thinking is right or wrong depending on how it is in line with the Word of the Gospel. And though the Gospel is not political, it does have political overtones. Because of this the Gospel can inform us how to judge the correctness of social and political positions.
The Catholic Church, since the time of Pope Leo XIII in 1891, has established 7 principles of social justice. The Church believes these are universal principles which can be found espoused, in some way, by all religions. Examining every question from the perspective of these principles helps us to make a correct judgement on whether a position being held is right or wrong. The first of these principles, called the foundational principle, is described as follows:
LIFE AND DIGNITY OF THE HUMAN PERSONThe Catholic Church proclaims that human life is sacred and that the dignity of the human person is the foundation of a moral vision for society. This belief is the foundation of all the principles of our social teaching. In our society, human life is under direct attack from abortion to euthanasia. Human life is threatened by cloning, embryonic stem cell research, and the use of the death penalty. The intentional targeting of civilians in war or terrorist attacks is always wrong. Catholic teaching calls on us to work to avoid war. Nations must protect the right to life by finding effective ways to prevent conflicts and resolve them by peaceful means. We believe that every person is precious, that people are more important than things, and that the measure of every institution is whether it threatens or enhances the life and dignity of the human person.
On November 12, 2025 the U.S. Bishops issued a “Special Message” on immigration at their Plenary Assembly in Baltimore addressing their concern for the evolving situation impacting immigrants in the United States. It marked the first time in twelve years the USCCB invoked this particularly urgent way of speaking as a body of bishops.. . . a “Special Message” may only be issued at plenary assemblies, and they are statements which the President of the Conference, the Administrative Committee, or the general membership consider to be appropriate in view of the circumstances at the time. A “Special Message” must receive two-thirds approval of the Conference members present and voting at the plenary in order to pass. In a vote of 216 votes in favor, 5 votes against, and 3 abstentions, the bishops overwhelmingly approved the “Special Message” of November 12. (cf. full message below.)
comments about this essay or the message of the US Bishops welcome